Search SCOTUSblog

ESC

Type to search articles, cases, and authors.

Press ↵ to view all results.

Skip to main content
CasesStatisticsCalendarJustices
NewsCommentaryAbout
NewslettersPodcastsSubscribe
TrendingMerits CasesCourt NewsExplainersEmergency appeals and applications
Court News

Court extends temporary order allowing access to abortion pill by mail

amy-howe thumbnail
ByAmy Howe
/May 11, 2026
Court_Building_at_Dusk
(Joe Ravi via Wikimedia)

Mifepristone, one of the two drugs used in medication abortions, which are the most common form of abortions in the United States, will remain widely available throughout the United States, at least for now. In a pair of brief orders, Justice Samuel Alito extended the temporary pause – known as an administrative stay – that he had placed on a ruling by a federal appeals court in Louisiana, which would require mifepristone to be dispensed in person. That pause, which had been scheduled to expire at 5 p.m. EDT on Monday, will now last at least until 5 p.m. EDT on Thursday, May 14.

This is the second time that the Supreme Court has been asked to intervene in the battle over mifepristone. In 2024, in FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, the justices ruled unanimously that doctors and medical groups opposed to abortion did not have a legal right to sue, known as standing, to challenge the FDA’s roll-back of restrictions on access to mifepristone – for example, allowing the drug to be used through the 10th week of pregnancy rather than the seventh, and allowing it to be prescribed through telehealth appointments and dispensed through the mail.

Louisiana went to federal court last year, seeking to reinstate the in-person dispensing requirement. It contended that allowing mifepristone to be sent through the mail to women in Louisiana effectively circumvented the state’s strict abortion laws.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit agreed that the state has a legal right to sue, and it granted the state’s request to restore the in-person requirement while litigation continues.

That prompted two manufacturers of mifepristone, Danco Laboratories and GenBioPro, to come to the Supreme Court on May 2, seeking to pause the 5th Circuit’s order and allow mifepristone to be distributed by mail. GenBioPro told the justices that freezing the 5th Circuit’s order would simply “allow the years-long status quo to remain in force while the Food and Drug Administration (‘FDA’) completes its ongoing review” of mifepristone’s safety. If that order remains in place, it argues, “it would eliminate access to mifepristone through certified pharmacies and by mail, abruptly cutting off access for patients nationwide—including in the States that do not ban abortion.”

Louisiana countered that it had suffered the kind of injuries that give it a legal right to sue. Not only had its sovereignty been injured by the violation of its laws and its inability to enforce those laws, it contended, but it has incurred financial costs to investigate cases in which mifepristone has been sent from out of state and cases in which women who take mifepristone have had to go to the emergency room, leading to large Medicaid bills that the state must shoulder.

Alito on May 4 issued administrative stays – which put the 5th Circuit’s order on hold to give the justices time to consider the drug companies’ request – that were initially scheduled to last until Monday, May 11, at 5 p.m. EDT. But shortly before those stays were scheduled to expire, Alito extended them until Thursday, May 14, at 5 p.m. EDT.

amy-howe thumbnail
Amy HoweFounder & Reporter

Amy Howe is the co-founder of SCOTUSblog and its primary reporter.

Recommended Citation: Amy Howe, Court extends temporary order allowing access to abortion pill by mail, SCOTUSblog (May. 11, 2026, 6:02 PM), https://www.scotusblog.com/2026/05/court-extends-temporary-order-allowing-access-to-abortion-pill-by-mail/

Court News/Emergency appeals and applications
Share
TwitterEmail
Cases Mentioned
Danco Laboratories v. Louisiana25A1207
GenBioPro v. Louisiana25A1208
Related Articles
Justices validate authority of federal courts to confirm arbitration awards – at least in cases already in federal court
ByRonald Mann/May 15, 2026

Court denies Virginia’s request to reinstate congressional map that would benefit Democrats
ByAmy Howe/May 15, 2026

Justice Clarence Thomas reflects on shared values and his “deeper” friendships on a past court
ByAmy Howe/May 15, 2026
Each weekday, we present news articles and commentary related to the Supreme Court in a smart, approachable way.

Stay informed on every decision.

Receive essential Court news every morning.


SCOTUSblog

The premier source for Supreme Court news, analysis, and data since 2002. Independent and non-partisan.

Coverage
Latest NewsRecurring ColumnsOutside OpinionsInterim Docket Blog
CoverageLatest NewsRecurring ColumnsOutside OpinionsInterim Docket Blog
Cases
Oral Argument DocketInterim DocketPetitionsCapital CasesCalendarStatistics
CasesOral Argument DocketInterim DocketPetitionsCapital CasesCalendarStatistics
Podcasts
Advisory OpinionsAmarica's ConstitutionDivided Argument
PodcastsAdvisory OpinionsAmarica's ConstitutionDivided Argument
Newsletters
SCOTUStodaySCOTUS OpinionsAdvisory Opinions
NewslettersSCOTUStodaySCOTUS OpinionsAdvisory Opinions
About
ManifestoStaffContact UsAdvertisingSubmissionsFAQs
AboutManifestoStaffContact UsAdvertisingSubmissionsFAQs

© 2026 SCOTUSblog. All rights reserved.

ArchivePrivacy PolicyEditorial PolicyTerms of Use

Welcome

Tell us a bit about yourself and choose what you’d like to hear from us. You can change any of it any time in your account.