Skip to main contentSkip to navigation
Hands hold smartphones displaying the logos of OpenAI and Hugging Face.
Hugging Face’s chief executive said the attack was ‘mind-blowing’ but that he believed there was ‘no malicious intent’ from OpenAI. Photograph: Andre M Chang/Zuma Press Wire/Shutterstock
Hugging Face’s chief executive said the attack was ‘mind-blowing’ but that he believed there was ‘no malicious intent’ from OpenAI. Photograph: Andre M Chang/Zuma Press Wire/Shutterstock

AI agent went rogue and hacked startup by itself, OpenAI reveals

Firm behind ChatGPT reveals agent powered by its models chose to attack Hugging Face database by itself

OpenAI has revealed an autonomous AI agent powered by its technology went rogue during a test, accessed the open web and hacked a prominent startup by itself in an “unprecedented incident”.

The company behind ChatGPT said the startup Hugging Face had detected and contained the agent – an AI tool designed to carry out tasks without human assistance – which had entered its systems.

“We consider this incident to be an unprecedented cyber incident, involving state-of-the-art cyber capabilities,” OpenAI said.

The company said it expected this type of incident to become more commonplace as models – the technology that underpins AI tools such as chatbots and agents – become more capable.

OpenAI said the hack occurred via an agent powered by a combination of its latest publicly available model, called GPT-5.6 Sol, and an even more capable model that is yet to be released.

While being tested internally on their hacking capabilities in an enclosed digital laboratory known as a sandbox, the models gained open internet access – effectively an escape route – by locating a vulnerability that had not been discovered before.

The agent then hacked Hugging Face, which is a database of AI models, to locate technology that would help it pass the hacking evaluation. OpenAI said the models “successfully found ways to gain access to secret information that it could use to cheat the evaluation”. The attack ended when Hugging Face’s security team and its own AI agents spotted and stopped the rogue activity.

Hugging Face’s chief executive, Clément Delangue, said the attack was “mind-blowing” but believed there was “no malicious intent” from OpenAI.

“We suspected last week’s cyber-attack might have come from a frontier lab, given the sophistication of the agent,” he wrote on X.

The term for an unknown IT flaw is a zero-day vulnerability because developers have zero minutes to fix the problem. In April, OpenAI’s close rival Anthropic said its Mythos model had found thousands of these flaws.

skip past newsletter promotion

The revelation of Mythos’s ability to locate and exploit zero days led to the US government restricting exports of Mythos and its sister model Fable 5, although it has since lifted the ban. GPT-5.6 Sol had similar restrictions but has since been rolled out worldwide.

Greg Casar, a Democratic US congressman, said the incident was alarming.

“AI is developing extremely fast with no real regulations to keep us safe,” he said in a statement calling for mandatory independent safety testing, mandatory disclosure of security incidents and international cooperation “to keep people safe from absolute disaster”.

More on this story

More on this story

  • Boost City regulator’s powers to help protect UK consumers from AI, says watchdog

  • OpenAI ‘in early talks to give 5% stake to US government’

  • OpenAI staggers AI model release after Trump administration request

  • Anthropic says US has lifted export controls on Fable and Mythos AI models after security fears

  • Meta pauses employee tracker for AI training amid privacy concerns

  • As the tech mega-IPO race heats up, has OpenAI missed its moment?

  • double quotation markElon Musk and co may relish march of the robots but there must be AI boundaries in the workplace

  • Anthropic surges as OpenAI struggles to keep up

  • Anthropic confidentially files for initial public offering on US stock market

  • Doctors and NHS could be sued for mistakes made by AI tools, report warns

Most viewed

Most viewed