Moxley Press Politics

Council approves transit-priority lanes on six corridors, citing two-year congestion study

Commissioners voted 5–2 to expand the pilot after data showed measurable peak-hour delays. The dissenters cited cost; supporters pointed to ridership.

Photo
The eastbound 14th Street corridor at 5:42 p.m. on May 6, 2026. · Photo · placeholder
Editor's note This story has been updated to reflect the official roll-call record. The corrections log entry is appended below.

The county council on Wednesday approved six transit-priority corridors after a two-year congestion study found that peak-hour delays on those routes were measurably worse than the regional average. The vote, 5–2, came after four hours of public comment and the late release of a procurement memo that had been requested under public records law.

Supporters argued the lanes will reduce average bus travel times by an estimated seven minutes during morning rush. Two commissioners — Hale (D-3) and Vega (R-5) — voted no, citing an estimated capital expenditure of $42 million spread over three fiscal years.

What the data showed

The study, conducted jointly by the regional transit authority and a university-affiliated transportation lab, tracked 184 buses across 28 routes between February 2023 and February 2025. Peak-hour delays on the six selected corridors averaged 11.4 minutes longer than off-peak service.

If a bus is the city's most-used public asset, then giving buses their own lane is not a privilege. It's basic infrastructure. — K. Okafor, transit advocate

Construction is scheduled to begin in September. The council also approved a $1.2 million accountability program that will publish monthly travel-time data publicly — a measure inserted by Commissioner Stein after testimony from the regional disability rights coalition.

What dissenters argue

Hale and Vega argued the program does not solve the underlying issue of suburban-to-urban traffic and would penalize drivers without a workable alternative. Vega proposed a smaller two-corridor pilot, which failed 3–4. Hale said her opposition was budgetary, not philosophical, and indicated she would re-evaluate if implementation costs come in below estimate.

Correction · 14 May 2026, 14:22 GMT
An earlier version of this story stated the vote was 4–3. The official roll-call record shows the vote was 5–2. The headline and second paragraph have been updated.
Sources & methods
  1. Regional Transit Authority & State University Transportation Lab joint study, 2025 (published, on file)
  2. Procurement memo released under records request 26-PR-1142
  3. Public testimony, 8 May 2026 council session (recorded)

The reporter consulted the official roll-call record, the joint transit-authority study, the procurement memo released under records request 26‑PR‑1142, and the recorded public testimony from the 8 May 2026 council session. Reviewed by Harold Finch (Copy Chief & Standards Editor) prior to publication. No anonymous sources were used.